Batchelor & Ramyar, 2006
The Dow, 1914–2002
A few significant Fibonacci ratios appear, but no more than chance predicts given the number of tests.
A research project on Bitcoin's full price history. The minute data from three exchanges is collected and verified. The wave counting is not built.
Data until .... Research, not trading advice or signals.
Batchelor & Ramyar, 2006
A few significant Fibonacci ratios appear, but no more than chance predicts given the number of tests.
Kempen, 2016
Across 17,931 retracements, no Fibonacci level stands out. Retracements follow a log-normal distribution.
Bitcoin
Figures like "73% of wave 2s retrace 50–61.8%" come from posts and blogs, with no chance baseline.
Prechter's reply is fair: Elliott claims ratios between specific wave pairs, so testing every swing dilutes the effect. Testing that properly takes clean data first.
Spot · BTC/USD
The longest history. Checked against the ff137 snapshot, its own candles and TradingView prices. Before 2013 it is mostly no-trade minutes.
Spot · BTCUSDT
Every archive checksum verified. Checked against its own candles and TradingView prices. The missing minutes are real exchange outages.
Linear perp · BTCUSDT
Checked against its own candles. Prices and volumes match TradingView's BYBIT:BTCUSDT.P, and this is the chart's default.
Numbers as of the last export, ....
The forming minute is never stored. A bar counts as complete only when a successful fetch really covered it.
Raw rows are exactly what the exchange returned. Missing minutes are recorded, never invented.
Bars use traded minutes only. Flat no-trade minutes would invent opens and extremes.
If a closed day changes later, its old file is kept and its revision goes up.
What gets built next is not decided.
Candlesticks for all three venues, on 1D, 4H, 1H and 15m, with no drawings on top.
Research, not trading advice or signals.